From da76426f542283e368f6ee8ef554c2b542fd537a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jake Swenson Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:50:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Grammer changes and some helpful tips --- README.md | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 4862b85..765b44a 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -3,12 +3,33 @@ This project is a tool to modify bitwardens core dll to allow me to self license. Beware this does janky IL magic to rewrite the bitwarden core dll and install my self signed certificate. +## Building + +There's no formal build script/process yet. To build your own `bitwarden/api` image run +```bash +dotnet restore +dotnet publish +docker build . -t bitbetter/api +``` + +replace anywhere `bitwarden/api` is used with `bitbetter/api` and give it a go. no promises + +## Issuing your own licenses + +The repo is setup to replace the licesning signing cert in bitwarden.core with my own personal self signed cert (`cert.cert`) +If you want to be able to sign your own licenses obviously you'll have to replace it with your own self signed cert. + +you can generate one with openssl like so: +```bash +openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:4096 -keyout key.pem -out cert.cert -days 36500 -outform DER +``` + ## But why? Its open source? Yes, bitwarden is great. If I didn't care about it i wouldn't be doing this. I was bothered that if i want to host bitwarden myself, at my house, for my family to use (with the ability to share access) I would still have to pay a monthly ENTERPRISE organization fee. -To host it myself. And maintain it myself. Basically WTH was bit wardening doing I was paying them for? +To host it myself. And maintain it myself. Basically WTH was bitwarden doing that I was paying them for? ## You should have reached out to bitwarden