mirror of
https://github.com/node-red/node-red-nodes.git
synced 2023-10-10 13:36:58 +02:00
Updated Email (markdown)
parent
2a676bf95b
commit
141de561dd
4
Email.md
4
Email.md
@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ Consider an email message that is sitting on an email server. It appears that a
|
||||
|
||||
__Question__: Is the email message retrieved via IMAP and POP3 the same format/content? If I retrieve the "blob-o-data" that represents my email, do I get the same think with both IMAP and POP3 retrievers?
|
||||
|
||||
__Answer__: NK 2016-03-07 - After testing, the answer is yes. Whether the email is received in parts via IMAP or as a complete entity using POP3, the result in both cases is identical and can be fed into `mailparser` for processing.
|
||||
|
||||
__Question__: For POP3 clients, is it acceptable to delete/destroy a message once received and processed?
|
||||
|
||||
__Question__: For attachments, how should the attachment be stored in the attachments array?
|
||||
@ -123,3 +125,5 @@ An example attachment includes:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
* `mailparser` works against POP3 retrieved messages, can it work against IMAP?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. Testing has shown that using the IMAP library, if we request both HEADER and TEXT parts and then invoke `mailparser.write(message)` for each message part received, we can then call `mailparser.end()` and the parsing occurs as desired. This means that both POP3 and IMAP can both leverage `mailparser`.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user